Splitting up anidolic daylighting systems

A computer model can help determine where to use highly reflective coatings in natural-lighting systems, thus increasing their overall efficiency.
13 August 2009
Friedrich Linhart, Stephen K. Wittkopf, and Jean-Louis Scartezzini

Sunshine outdoors often exceeds the required workplace illuminance inside office buildings by several orders of magnitude. If sufficient daylight flux can be made available indoors without disturbing the occupants (for example, through glare), the building's artificial-lighting load can be drastically reduced, saving large amounts of electricity.1 Increasing the availability of sunlight in buildings is not only highly desirable for energy-efficiency reasons, but also for improvements in health and well-being.2

Anidolic daylighting systems (ADS), typically a facade-integrated collector system with an adjacent horizontal-mirror light duct inside the building, are particularly interesting because they perform well in both sunny and overcast sky conditions.1,3,4 However, so far ADS exist mainly as prototypes. To make these systems viable for large-scale building integration, researchers must look closely at the parameters that influence performance to find appropriate solutions for most buildings. We recently developed a new computer model that makes it possible to analyze the effects of different coating materials applied to elements of an anidolic integrated ceiling (AIC).

The AIC, first introduced in 1998,5 is shown in Figure 1. A zenithal collector covered by double glazing captures daylight from the sun and a sky vault. Two anidolic elements then redirect the daylight flux into a highly reflective, 5m-long duct, which conducts it to the distributor element. The latter then distributes the light into the office room. G. Courret's team calculated an overall system efficiency of 32% (ratio of the light flux emerging at the distributor exit to the incoming flux at the collector entry).5

Figure 1. Office room equipped with an anidolic integrated ceiling composed of two anidolic collector elements, a light duct and a distributor element.

In the past, all simulations carried out for this system4,5 used a basic computer model that analyzed the entire AIC as one piece. Researchers assigned a global specular reflectance of 90% to the entire AIC. Within the framework of the design of a zero-energy building in Singapore, we optimized this basic computer model and carried out various simulations for local sky conditions using the software tool Photopia.6 One of the advantages of this new model is that the AIC has been split up into different components. In theory, we can now assign a different coating material to each of these elements. This opens myriad new simulation options and is an important step towards development of customized ADS.

Our computer model enables us to look deeply into the three main components: collector, duct, and distributor. Figure 2 shows the distinct parts into which the zenithal collector can be split up. We save each of these components on a separate layer in an AutoCAD file and subsequently import them into Photopia as a luminaire. Photopia recognizes the different layers and allows us to assign a separate material to each one.

Figure 2. Anidolic collector elements implemented in our model.

Figure 3. Efficiency improvement when only one collector element is coated with a highly reflective silver-dot coating.

Figure 3 shows the simulation's predicted efficiency improvements when only one collector element is coated with a highly reflective silver-dot coating (98% specular reflectance) and all other AIC elements use the initial aluminum coating (90% specular reflectance). For simulated Singapore sky conditions, using this highly reflective coating makes the most sense on ‘Anidolic element 1,’ the main component of the zenithal collector (or ‘Sunscoop’).

Our computer model can be helpful in the design process of specific office buildings. It enables us to find optimized solutions for many different building types, orientations, and geographical locations. In the future, we will adapt our model to different building constraints and perform detailed assessment of lighting conditions in ADS-equipped office rooms.

Many thanks to Mark Jongewaard at LTI (Lighting Technologies Inc.) Optics for his help with the software tool Photopia 3.0.

Stephen K. Wittkopf
Solar Energy Research Institute of Singapore (SERIS)
National University of Singapore (NUS)
Singapore, Singapore
Solar Energy and Building Physics Laboratory (LESO-PB)
Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Lausanne (EPFL)
Lausanne, Switzerland

Stephen Wittkopf earned his doctoral degree from the University of Technology in Darmstadt, Germany, in 2001. He then joined NUS to teach and research in the Architecture Department. In 2008 he took on a joint appointment with the newly established SERIS. His interest is in sustainable architecture with a focus on solar energy, promoting advanced daylighting, and building-integrated photovoltaics.

Friedrich Linhart, Jean-Louis Scartezzini
Lausanne, Switzerland

Friedrich Linhart is a PhD candidate working on energy-efficient lighting solutions. He holds degrees from the University of Technology in Darmstadt (electrical engineering and information technology) and the École Centrale de Lyon, France (general engineering science). Friedrich worked as an intern for ABB, Bosch, and A. T. Kearney before joining LESO-PB in June 2006.

Jean-Louis Scartezzini heads LESO-PB and the doctoral program in Environment. He is the author of more than 200 scientific publications, a member of several federal commissions and international experts groups, and associate editor of several scientific journals.

Recent News
Sign in to read the full article
Create a free SPIE account to get access to
premium articles and original research