Share Email Print

Proceedings Paper

Impact of luminance distribution in the visual field on foveal contrast sensitivity in the context of mammographic softcopy reading
Author(s): Dörte Apelt; Richard Rascher-Friesenhausen; Jan Klein; Hans Strasburger; Bernhard Preim; Heinz-Otto Peitgen
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $17.00 $21.00

Paper Abstract

For quality control in mammographic softcopy reading (SCR) a number of recommendations exists. Among them is a room illuminance of 10 lx. Moreover, the use of masks on the image seems to be advantageous, due to a reduction of scattered light in the focus of view. Room illuminance affects the global luminance adaptation and the maximal monitor contrast; masking decreases the luminance in the central and near-peripheral region. We investigated the effects of masking and illuminance on foveal contrast sensitivity. A study with eight observers was conducted in the context of mammographic softcopy reading. Using Gabor patterns with varying spatial frequencies, orientations and contrast levels as stimuli and an orientation discrimination task, the intraobserver contrast sensitivity was determined for foveal vision. Tested illuminances for a non-masked image were 10, 30, 50 and 90 lx, and for a masked image 10 lx. Major findings are: (1) Masking does not lead to improved contrast sensitivity. Instead, all observers reported a strong fatigue effect during the presentation of the masked image. (2) Among the illuminances tested, only half of the observers showed the best contrast sensitivity at 10 lx. For the other observers best results were achieved at illuminance levels of 50 or 90 lx, respectively. The results can be used to appraise the effects of viewing conditions with the aim of drawing conclusions for mammographic SCR, and to initiate further studies.

Paper Details

Date Published: 12 March 2009
PDF: 9 pages
Proc. SPIE 7263, Medical Imaging 2009: Image Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment, 72630B (12 March 2009); doi: 10.1117/12.810227
Show Author Affiliations
Dörte Apelt, MeVis BreastCare Solutions GmbH & Co. KG (Germany)
Richard Rascher-Friesenhausen, Fraunhofer MEVIS (Germany)
Jan Klein, Fraunhofer MEVIS (Germany)
Hans Strasburger, Univ. of Göttingen (Germany)
Bernhard Preim, Otto-von-Guericke Univ. (Germany)
Heinz-Otto Peitgen, Fraunhofer MEVIS (Germany)

Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 7263:
Medical Imaging 2009: Image Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment
Berkman Sahiner; David J. Manning, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top
Sign in to read the full article
Create a free SPIE account to get access to
premium articles and original research
Forgot your username?