Share Email Print

Proceedings Paper

Computer-aided detection of clustered microcalcifications on full-field digital mammograms: a two-view information fusion scheme for FP reduction
Author(s): Jun Ge; Berkman Sahiner; Heang-Ping Chan; Lubomir M. Hadjiiski; Mark A. Helvie M.D.; Chuan Zhou; Jun Wei; Yiheng Zhang
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $17.00 $21.00

Paper Abstract

We are developing new techniques to improve the performance of our computer-aided detection (CAD) system for clustered microcalcifications on full-field digital mammograms (FFDMs). In this study, we designed an information fusion scheme by using joint two-view information on craniocaudal (CC) and mediolateral-oblique (MLO) views. After cluster candidates were detected using a single-view detection technique, candidates on CC and MLO views were paired using their geometrical information. Candidate pairs were classified as true and false pairs with a similarity classifier that used the joint information from both views. Each cluster candidate was also characterized by its single-view features. The outputs of the similarity classifier and the single-view classifier were fused and the cluster candidate was classified as a true microcalcification cluster or a false-positive (FP) using the fused two-view information. A data set of 192 FFDM images was collected from 96 patients at the University of Michigan. All patients had two mammographic views. This data set contained 96 microcalcification clusters, of which 28 clusters were proven by biopsy to be malignant and 68 were proven to be benign. For training and testing the classifiers, the data set was partitioned into two independent subsets with the malignant cases equally distributed to the two subsets. One subset was used for training and the other subset was used for testing. We compared three computerized methods for geometrically pairing cluster candidates on two mammographic views. The areas under the fitted ROC curves were 0.75±0.01, 0.74±0.01, and 0.76±0.01 for the three methods, respectively. The difference between any two methods measured by the area under the fitted ROC curve, Az, was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). We also evaluated a new hybrid pairing scheme that used two different sensitivity levels for defining cluster pairs based on the single-view scores. The single-view CAD system achieved cluster-based sensitivities of 75%, 80%, and 85% at 0.48, 0.86, and 1.05 FPs/image, respectively. The joint two-view CAD system achieved the same sensitivity levels at 0.29, 0.46, and 0.89 FPs/image. When the hybrid pairing was used in the joint two-view CAD system, the same cluster-based sensitivities were achieved at 0.26, 0.37, and 0.88 FPs/image. Our results indicate that correspondence of cluster candidates on two different views provides valuable additional information for distinguishing FPs from true microcalcification clusters.

Paper Details

Date Published: 17 March 2006
PDF: 8 pages
Proc. SPIE 6144, Medical Imaging 2006: Image Processing, 61445R (17 March 2006);
Show Author Affiliations
Jun Ge, Univ. of Michigan (United States)
Berkman Sahiner, Univ. of Michigan (United States)
Heang-Ping Chan, Univ. of Michigan (United States)
Lubomir M. Hadjiiski, Univ. of Michigan (United States)
Mark A. Helvie M.D., Univ. of Michigan (United States)
Chuan Zhou, Univ. of Michigan (United States)
Jun Wei, Univ. of Michigan (United States)
Yiheng Zhang, Univ. of Michigan (United States)

Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 6144:
Medical Imaging 2006: Image Processing
Joseph M. Reinhardt; Josien P. W. Pluim, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top
Sign in to read the full article
Create a free SPIE account to get access to
premium articles and original research
Forgot your username?