
Proceedings Paper
Intrinsic camera resolution measurementFormat | Member Price | Non-Member Price |
---|---|---|
$17.00 | $21.00 |
Paper Abstract
Objective evaluation of digital image quality usually includes analysis of spatial detail in captured images. Although
previously-developed methods and standards have found success in the evaluation of system performance, the systems in
question usually include spatial image processing (e.g. sharpening or noise-reduction), and the results are influenced by
these operations. Our interest, however, is in the intrinsic resolution of the system. By this we mean the performance
primarily defined by the lens and imager, and not influenced by subsequent image processing steps that are invertible.
Examples of such operations are brightness and contrast adjustments, and simple sharpening and blurring (setting aside
image clipping and quantization). While these operations clearly modify image perception, they do not in general change
the fundamental spatial image information that is captured.
We present a method to measure an intrinsic spatial frequency response (SFR) computed from test image(s) for which
spatial operations may have been applied. The measure is intended ‘see through’ operations for which image detail is
retrievable but measure the loss of image resolution otherwise. We adopt a two-stage image capture model. The first
stage includes a locally-stable point-spread function (lens), the integration and sampling by the detector (imager), and
the introduction of detector noise. The second stage comprises the spatial image processing. We describe the validation
of the method, which was done using both simulation and actual camera evaluations.
Paper Details
Date Published: 8 February 2015
PDF: 13 pages
Proc. SPIE 9396, Image Quality and System Performance XII, 939609 (8 February 2015); doi: 10.1117/12.2083193
Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 9396:
Image Quality and System Performance XII
Mohamed-Chaker Larabi; Sophie Triantaphillidou, Editor(s)
PDF: 13 pages
Proc. SPIE 9396, Image Quality and System Performance XII, 939609 (8 February 2015); doi: 10.1117/12.2083193
Show Author Affiliations
Peter D. Burns, Burns Digital Imaging (United States)
Judit Martinez Bauza, Qualcomm Inc. (United States)
Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 9396:
Image Quality and System Performance XII
Mohamed-Chaker Larabi; Sophie Triantaphillidou, Editor(s)
© SPIE. Terms of Use
